Presentation of the Best Practice
Target challenge
- Environmental pollution
- Degradation of the Ecosystem (water stress)
- Vulnerability to climate Change
- Other (Please specify below)
- Extreme rain risks urban flooding and drainage overload. This practice attenuates runoff through temporary storage and controlled discharge, feeding the Murcia Este system to indirectly boost water for agricultural irrigation .
Area Typology
- Urban area
- Other (Please specify below)
- Dense Urban
Main beneficiaries
- Water Utilities
- Local Population
- Municipalities
- Management Authorities
- Other (Please specify below)
- Extreme rain risks urban flooding and drainage overload. This practice attenuates runoff through temporary storage and controlled discharge, feeding the Murcia Este system to indirectly boost water for agricultural irrigation.
Funding
- National funding
Used technologies / tools
- Nature based process
- Soil infiltration
- Sustainable Drainage Systems
- Others
- SUDS (Sustainable Urban Drainage System)
- PLC (Programmable Logic Controller)
- PP (Permeable Pavement)
Implementation site
NCW type
- Rainwater (RW)
NCW USE
- Landscaping
- Recreation Area
- Other (Please specify below)
Self-Assessment
TRL : Technology Levels
Its novelty lies not in the individual SUDS components, which are already known technologies, but in their integration within Murcia’s largest municipal Park & Ride facility, combining sustainable mobility, flood-risk reduction and indirect support to reclaimed-water production within a single urban infrastructure.
Obstacles to implementation
- High cost of technological solutions
- Other (Please specify below)
- Coordination with multiple underground utility networks during design and construction.; • Additional implementation costs compared with conventional stormwater drainage solutions
Obstacles to funding
How your Best Practice is economically feasible ?
The project was implemented as public urban infrastructure financed by Murcia City Council. Financial feasibility is supported by the integration of stormwater management, climate adaptation and sustainable mobility objectives within a single municipal investment. Although no formal cost-benefit analysis was identified in the reviewed documentation, the project justification is based on flood-risk reduction, improved urban resilience, groundwater recharge and environmental co-benefits associated with green infrastructure.Result of this assessment
No formal sustainability assessment report was identified in the available documentation. However, project documentation indicates expected benefits including stormwater infiltration, flood mitigation, groundwater recharge, reduced runoff, urban greening, support for climate adaptation and mitigation of urban heat-island effects through the integration of 152 trees and 936 shrubs. These should be considered expected project outcomes rather than results of a formal sustainability assessment.Enviromental impact
SDGs
Energy consumption comment
Validation/upscaling
Potentiel of exploitation/outscaling
Lessons learnt
Recommandations
Highlighted KPI
Technical indicators
Economical indicators
Without consideration of the depreciation period
Social impact of the BP
Jobs created
Jobs created comment: Approximately 20–25 temporary construction jobs and 2–3 indirect annual maintenance jobs